Remove 12
article thumbnail

California, Massachusetts, and Michigan – 2020 Ballot Initiatives on Privacy

Data Protection Report

The CPRA potentially extends the 12-month “look-back” period for access requests to an amount of time to be determined by new regulations, but this change would affect only information collected on or after January 1, 2022. Michigan – Search Warrant for Electronic Data. Constitution. Readers may recall that the U.S.

Privacy 40
article thumbnail

Privacy as a “Fundamental Right” Clouds Smart Regulation

Data Matters

*Originally Published July 12, 2018 by Chambers and Partners Data Protection & Cyber Security 2018. There is a lot going on with privacy around the world. Regulators simply assume that if privacy is at stake, regulation is ipso factojustified.

Privacy 74
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

What IG Professionals Should Know About the Internet of Bodies

ARMA International

Case law is beginning to address data collection and data privacy issues associated with the IoB. September 8, 2014. November 12, 2018. Searching for privacy in the internet of bodies.” One thing is clear: legislation will not be able to keep pace with technology. It has never been able to do so.

article thumbnail

2019 eDiscovery Case Law Year in Review, Part 1

eDiscovery Daily

Last year, eDiscovery Daily published 66 posts related to eDiscovery and data privacy case decisions and activities over the past year, covering 56 unique cases ! 2014: Part 1 , Part 2 , Part 3 , Part 4. As always, we had a number of interesting cases related to various eDiscovery topics. years, let’s take a look back at 2019!

article thumbnail

The right to be forgotten: the CJEU sides with Google in two landmark cases

Data Protection Report

1] CJEU, 13 May 2014, C-131-12, Google Spain SL, Google Inc. They also do little to relieve search engine operators’ burdens in adjudicating right to be forgotten requests – the balancing test remains as precarious as ever – and we therefore expect to see continued complaints and CJEU references in this area.