Conference, e-Discovery, Insurance and Metadata

2018 eDiscovery Case Law Year in Review, Part 4

eDiscovery Daily

JANUARY 9, 2019

And we all thought that Rule 37(e) had the biggest impact from the 2015 Federal Rules changes when maybe it was actually Rule 26(b)(1)! And, we’re also seeing parties identifying privacy as a reason not to comply with discovery requests (including at least one case where even the courts couldn’t agree on the outcome). LLC, et al.

e-Discovery

e-Discovery Metadata Insurance Privacy

Court Rejects Plaintiffs’ “Mindlessly Deficient” Objections to Native Format Production: eDiscovery Case Law

eDiscovery Daily

OCTOBER 23, 2018

The PDF files chosen by plaintiff for production are merely pictures of the materials that do not provide metadata.”. Instead, it relies upon Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(iii), which provides that “[a] party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.” Case Background.

e-Discovery

e-Discovery Metadata Insurance Education

Information Management Today

2018 eDiscovery Case Law Year in Review, Part 4

Court Rejects Plaintiffs’ “Mindlessly Deficient” Objections to Native Format Production: eDiscovery Case Law

Webinars

Stay Connected