author grant-gross 
Hunton Privacy
NOVEMBER 2, 2018
Additionally, like the EU General Data Protection Regulation, the draft bill proposes a maximum fine of 4% of total annual gross revenue for companies that are found to be in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.
Data Protection Report
AUGUST 16, 2018
California’s new privacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) grants California residents extensive new privacy rights. However, there is already some discussion of passing additional legislation to apply similar controls to California government authorities. This blog focuses on covered entities.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Data Matters
JUNE 22, 2022
The Connecticut Attorney General has sole enforcement authority, and violations of the law constitute an “unfair trade practice” under Connecticut law, with willful violations subject to statutory penalties of up to $5,000 and an initial 60-day right to cure. Data in Scope – The Majority Approach.
Data Matters
JUNE 4, 2020
Gov’t Code § 11349 et seq. ): Are they necessary to effect the purpose of the statute, based on facts, studies, and expert opinions; Does the CCPA provide authority for the proposed final regulations at issue; Are the proposed final regulations drafted with clarity so that they can be easily understood by those directly affected by them; and.
eDiscovery Daily
JANUARY 8, 2018
Scott granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel and defendant’s cross-motion in part, ordering the defendant to perform additional production over a disputed time period, based on a list of search terms ordered by Judge Scott. million because the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the doubling of back pay for whistleblower retaliation.
eDiscovery Daily
OCTOBER 15, 2018
37(e)” , the Magistrate Judge said that “In the end, given at least what appears to be the defendant’s gross negligence – and that’s viewing things favorably to the defendant – the best route is that proposed by the Advisory Committee in its notes to the 2015 amendment to Fed.R.Civ.P.
eDiscovery Daily
DECEMBER 11, 2017
Judge Parker denied the plaintiff’s request for information about the defendant’s TAR process, finding no evidence of gross negligence or unreasonableness in their process. Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. Case Background.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content