Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Person on Facebook on their phone.
Facebook generates revenue from building profiles of users and matching them with advertisers. Photograph: Wilfredo Lee/AP
Facebook generates revenue from building profiles of users and matching them with advertisers. Photograph: Wilfredo Lee/AP

Facebook sued for collecting personal data to target adverts

This article is more than 1 year old

In high court case that could set precedent for millions, Tanya O’Carroll alleges owner Meta is breaking UK data laws

A human rights campaigner is suing Facebook’s owner in the high court, claiming the company is disregarding her right to object against the collection of her personal data.

Tanya O’Carroll has launched a lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta alleging it has breached UK data laws by failing to respect her right to demand Facebook stop collecting and processing her data. Facebook generates revenue from building profiles of users and matching them with advertisers who direct ads at people targeting their specific interests and backgrounds.

O’Carroll told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This case is really about us all being able to connect with social media on our own terms, and without having to essentially accept that we should be subjected to hugely invasive tracking surveillance profiling just to be able to access social media.”

O’Carroll, a senior fellow at Foxglove, a UK legal campaign group that focuses on accountability in the technology industry, is claiming that Facebook has breached article 21 (2) of UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which gives individuals the right to protest against the processing of their personal data for marketing purposes. O’Carroll said a successful case could set a precedent for millions of Facebook, social media and search engine users.

“With this case, I’m really using this right that’s long been there on the law books, but has been up until now not been exercised, which is to simply say ‘I object’, and if we are successful in that then everybody will have that right,” she told the BBC.

O’Carroll has lodged a claim in the high court and is awaiting Meta’s acknowledgment of the claim and confirmation that the company intends to defend it, followed by a hearing and court judgment. O’Carroll is not seeking damages but a yes/no decision on whether she can opt out of being profiled for advertising purposes.

skip past newsletter promotion

A Meta spokesperson said: “We know that privacy is important to our users and we take this seriously. That’s why we build tools like privacy check-up and ads preferences, where we explain what data people have shared and show how they can exercise control over the type of ads they see.”

More on this story

More on this story

  • Meta value falls $190bn as investors react to plan to increase spending on AI

  • Terror watchdog condemns WhatsApp for lowering UK users’ minimum age to 13

  • Anger from campaigners as WhatsApp lowers age limit to 13 in UK and EU

  • Facebook and Instagram: Meta services hit by widespread outages

  • Facebook rules allow altered video casting Biden as paedophile, says board

  • Mark Zuckerberg to receive $700m from Meta dividends

  • Meta revenue soars as it pivots to AI and announces dividends for investors

  • Meta is the world’s ‘single largest marketplace for paedophiles’, says New Mexico attorney general

  • Instagram to scan under-18s’ messages to protect against ‘inappropriate images’

Most viewed

Most viewed