Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Cyber security message.
The technique would ‘cc’ an encrypted message to a third recipient. Photograph: Dave Hunt/AAP
The technique would ‘cc’ an encrypted message to a third recipient. Photograph: Dave Hunt/AAP

Apple and WhatsApp condemn GCHQ plans to eavesdrop on encrypted chats

This article is more than 4 years old

GCHQ ‘ghost protocol’ would seriously undermine user security and trust, says letter

A GCHQ proposal that would enable eavesdropping on encrypted chat services has been condemned as a “serious threat” to digital security and human rights.

In an open letter signed by more than 50 companies, civil society organisations and security experts – including Apple, WhatsApp, Liberty and Privacy International – GCHQ was called on to abandon its so-called “ghost protocol”, and instead focus on “protecting privacy rights, cybersecurity, public confidence, and transparency”.

The proposal was first mooted by two senior intelligence officials, Ian Levy, the technical director of the UK’s national cyber security centre, and Crispin Robinson, head of cryptanalysis (the technical term for codebreaking) at GCHQ, in November 2018.

The pair put forward a technique that would avoid breaking encryption, instead requiring encrypted messaging services to – in effect – “cc” the encrypted message to a third recipient, at the same time as sending it directly. Levy and Robinson argued that the proposal was “no more intrusive than the virtual crocodile clips” which are used today in wiretaps of non-encrypted communications.

Opposing the plan, the letter argues that “to achieve this result, their proposal requires two changes to systems that would seriously undermine user security and trust.

“First, it would require service providers to surreptitiously inject a new public key into a conversation in response to a government demand. This would turn a two-way conversation into a group chat where the government is the additional participant, or add a secret government participant to an existing group chat.

“Second, in order to ensure the government is added to the conversation in secret, GCHQ’s proposal would require messaging apps, service providers, and operating systems to change their software so that it would 1) change the encryption schemes used, and/or 2) mislead users by suppressing the notifications that routinely appear when a new communicant joins a chat.”

While GCHQ’s proposal stops short of calling for “back doors” to encryption, which experts have argued inherently introduce security flaws that can be exploited by hackers, its opponents argue that it does almost as much damage by undermining trust in security altogether.

“The overwhelming majority of users rely on their confidence in reputable providers to perform authentication functions and verify that the participants in a conversation are the people they think they are, and only those people. The GCHQ’s ghost proposal completely undermines this trust relationship and the authentication process,” the letter argues.

Replying, the NCSC’s Ian Levy said: “We welcome this response to our request for thoughts on exceptional access to data - for example to stop terrorists. The hypothetical proposal was always intended as a starting point for discussion.

“We will continue to engage with interested parties and look forward to having an open discussion to reach the best solutions possible.”

Apple, one of the signatories to the letter, is no stranger to this argument. The company endured a widely publicised standoff with the FBI in 2015 and 2016 over the company’s refusal to breach a different sort of encryption, that which protects the contents of a locked iPhone. Eventually, the FBI backed down, finding another way into the device without Apple’s help.

More on this story

More on this story

  • EU lawyers say plan to scan private messages for child abuse may be unlawful

  • WhatsApp and Signal unite against online safety bill amid privacy concerns

  • WhatsApp would not remove end-to-end encryption for UK law, says chief

  • Signal app warns it will quit UK if law weakens end-to-end encryption

  • Computers need to make a quantum leap before they can crack encrypted messages

  • Privacy changes set Apple at odds with UK government over online safety bill

  • Apple announces new security and privacy measures amid surge in cyber-attacks

  • Cracking apps: are crimefighters going too far to bring down cartels?

  • Online safety bill will criminalise ‘downblousing’ and ‘deepfake’ porn

  • Can a new form of cryptography solve the internet’s privacy problem?

Most viewed

Most viewed